That was why the Twitter Duck would threaten to bomb 52 Iranian cultural sites if Iran retaliated following the killing of Soleimani.
Of course, Iran is going to retaliate at the cowardly drone killing of one of its most respected sons and effectively second in command in the Iranian ruling hierarchy.
How and by what means retaliations will come are the subject Trump and his henchmen have to contend with now.
Bombing Iran's cultural sites would not only be considered a war crime but also a declaration of war not on the country per se, but on it's people whom the Duck had declared he had nothing against.
With his rather stupid, unwise and reckless decision in ordering the elimination of the Iranian general when there apparently was no imminent reason or justification, the Duck has to go to war if Iran retaliated, as it surely would, or be considered a coward and a sissy.
This is classic 'Don't Answer A Direct Question With A Direct Answer' Thingy
That raises more doubts and only goes to reinforce the perception that truth is a hard thing to come by
That is why it is dangerous to vote a pea-brain into the White House, no?
No comments:
Post a Comment